|
This might not be the right thing to do because it can have negative impacts, especially if schemas are not correct. There isn’t any integration with other tools, for example, it would be good to provide accurate traffic data if the site can be integrated directly with Search Console, instead of using Semrush. We all know search volumes are not accurate in Semrush, to say the least. Which makes InLinks data and forecasts not accurate either. Conclusion Overall, while InLinks automations are super useful, I don’t think you can trust its schema automation just yet.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s better to have to fix or delete some Schemas instead of building them from scratch, however, being Canada Phone Number List Schema automation one of the core features of InLinks, and I wouldn’t trust them completely. I’d recommend you to manually review the schema before publishing them live on your website. The monthly expenses are probably justified if you feel the system can do a good job on a certain number of key, highly selected pages, rather than all pages. Which means you should carefully select the pages you want optimised in order to save money in the bank.

I also think the topic associations and internal linking work much better than schema automation features. Internal links automation doesn’t require any human check and I found to be often accurate. The topic association is also 100% accurate and I really like the fact that you can find topic gaps within your website, in order to inform your content production. In terms of SEO results, it’s too early to say whether the tool is bringing good results yet, as we know things take time in SEO, but the initial hopes are very high. InLinks is a data tool that helps you optimise your website for semantic search.
|
|